Knocking down icons and raising flags

On the day following the historic Breixt vote in the United Kingdom, it seems that the world is ready to knock down icons of stability and throw caution to the wind. The regime of the EU evolved to maintain world economic order after the battles of World War II. So it seems quite appropriate that the greatest icon of that war fell, or at least was corrected, this week as well.

The United States Marine Corps acknowledged this week, seventy-one years after the event, that it had misidentified one of the Marines in Joe Rosenthal’s ironic flag raising image from Iwo Jima. The previously unknown Pfc. Harold Schultz of Detroit is the sixth man in the picture, service leaders confirmed.

This speaks to two things. First, is the tenuous state of information from that time compared to ours. And second, is the power of photography to capture, freeze the moment, and ultimately play witness to the facts.

Death of the Monster Polaroid

This past Sunday was Father’s Day, and I wanted to put up on Face Book some old pictures of my son and me. So I pulled out some old prints and scanned them into my computer. This is a very unsatisfactory experience.  What you wind up with is something pretty fuzzy and certainly not up to digital standards, I am coming to hate film. It is not that there is anything wrong or intrinsically unsharp about film photography. It is just that the way it was practiced was often mediocre, and the process of going from object to negative to print to scanner to computer is fraught with analog steps. Your picture is only as good as the camera lens, only as good as the enlarger lens, only as good as your scanner optics. So the digital life is good.

Still there are those that love film. And on Monday morning I read an article in the New York Times entitled “Champions of a Monster Polaroid Yield to the Digital World.”  Back in the 1970s Polaroid Corporation’s president Edwin H. Land had five behemoth Polaroid cameras built of wood. These cameras used gigantic 20” x 24” sheets of polaroid film. They sat upon hospital gurney wheels and weighed 200 lbs a piece. They were designed to demonstrate the quality of the company’s large-format film. But cameras were quickly adopted by artists like: Chuck Close and Robert Rauschenberg and photographers like William Wegman, David Levinthal and Mary Ellen Mark. They made instant images that had the size and presence of sculpture or of heroic oil paintings.  These, of course, harkened back to the days of very large format photography and at the time represented a great marriage between the high-tech and the antiquated.

In 2008, Polaroid filed for bankruptcy and stopped producing its instant film. However, former Polaroid engineer John Reuter put together an group of investors and bought up one of the original cameras and hundreds of cases of the original film. He formed  the 20×24 Studio. The plan was to reinvigorate the manufacture, but demand was not there and the materials have a finite lifetime. The company will close by the end of the year, and with it will fall yet another photographic art form.

I will not comment about whether this is only the first death kneel of film in photography. Chuck Close commented that “I haven’t given up… Here’s yet another medium that will be lost to history, and it just shouldn’t be allowed to happen. If it does, I don’t know what I’m going to do, to tell you the truth. It’s so integrated into everything I do. I can always imagine what making a painting from one of those pictures will look like.”

What is most interesting to me is that the forms to disappear irrevocably are the ones that require sophisticated manufacture or processing – the high tech ones. You can make your own dry plates, collodion plates, albumin paper, platinum palladium prints, even daguerreotypes. But when it comes to roll film, especially color with its complex demanding processing and really all bets are off. I think that it would be wonderful to create today autochrome, not digital mockeries but the bona fide thing. It might even be doable with a lot of dedication and hard work.

So it seemed as I struggled trying to make something appealing of mediocre prints worth reflecting on this transitional moment in the technology of photography. These Polaroid 20” x 24” prints are indeed a marvel to behold.  This is especially true for those of us who remember the Polaroid Instamatic, gooey chemicals, and piles of failed photographs a dollar a pop lying on the floor.

I. W. Taber

Figure 1 - I. W. Taber portrait of Princess Kaiulani, taken in San Francisco c 1897. In the Hawaii State Archives and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 1 – I. W. Taber portrait of Princess Kaiulani, taken in San Francisco c 1897. In the Hawaii State Archives and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Our discussion yesterday about Loïe Fuller and the wonderful performance portrait of her by I. W. Taber begs the obvious question of exactly who Taber was? Isaiah West Taber (1830 – 1912) was an American photographer of the nineteenth century, who practiced in daguerreotypes. ambrotypes, and albumen prints. He was also a dentist and sketch artist and is today most known for his stereoscopic views of the American West. Taber was born in New Bedford, Massachusetts. From 1845-1849 he was a whaler.  He briefly settled as a photographer in California in 1850, but opened his first studio in Syracuse, NY in 1854. In 1864 he returned to San Francisco, working first in the studio of Bradley and Rulofson. He opened his own studio in 1871.

Significantly, in 1880 Taber spent six weeks in Hawaii where he photographed Hawaiian King Kalākaua, on commission. In the following year the King visited Taber’s studio in San Francisco. Taber is also famous for street scenes of San Francisco and portraits of the California Dignitaries of the day. Unfortunately, the great San Francisco earthquake of 1906 and the subsequent fire destroyed his gallery including his collection of negatives and this ended his photographic career.

The quality of Taber’s work is arguably best revealed in two stunning portraits of Hawaiian Princess Kaiulani that were taken during a 1997 visit to San Francisco and the United States in hopes of restoring the Hawaiian Monarchy after its overthrow in 1892. One of these portraits is shown in Figure 1. The dress and hat are truly gorgeous. The book is meant, as it so often does in Western portrait art, to convey erudition. But I think the most captivating aspect of the portrait is the expression at once regal and demur. Kaiulani was only 22 at the time of the portrait. Tragically, she died two years later on March 6, 1899 at the age of 23 of inflammatory rheumatism. Poignantly, her father also said that he thought that since Hawaii was gone, it was fitting for Kaʻiulani to go as well.

 

Mysteries of the Belle Époque – Part III – Loïe Fuller

Figure 1 - Painting of Loie Fuller by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. From the Wikipedia and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 1 – Painting of Loie Fuller by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. From the Wikipedia and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Today I thought that we would get out of the woods and return to the Belle Époque. For some reason the other day the great dancer of that period, Loïe Fuller (1862-1928), came to my mind, and I started searching for photographs and videos of her. Loïe Fuller was a visionary, and in many regards like Evelyn Nesbit, like Sarah Bernhardt, like Anna Pavlova, and like Isadora Duncan she pioneered what performance stars do today – they ride the wave of a shrinking world and the developing technologies that promoted worldwide connectivity.

She was born Marie Louise Fuller outside of Chicago in Fullersburg, Illinois. She began her theatrical career as a professional child actress and later as a “skirt dancer” in burlesque. She was essentially self-taught and developed her own characteristic techniques. Her choreography combined colorful silk costumes illuminated by multi-colored lighting, again by her own design. One of her most famous works was the “Serpentine Dance” and there is a miraculous hand-colored film clip made in 1896 by the Lumiere Brothers of it being perfomed. Apparently, the dancer in this is not Fuller herself but  flame dancer Papinta.

While Fuller became famous in America, she felt underappreciated and after a warm reception in Paris during a European tour persuaded, she was persuaded to remain in France, becoming a regular performer at the Folies Bergère at the Moulin Rouge with works such as her “Fire Dance.” Indeed, one of the reasons that we remember her today is because of paintings and posters of her performances by such artists as Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864-1901). Figure 1 is a painting of her by Toulouse-Lautrec. It is also significant to note that many of Fullers costumes required elaborate technical designs, which she invented and patented.

Not surprisingly, this colorful figure and her flowing costumes and dramatic lighting attracted the great photographers of her day, Searching among them is truly a visual delight. I have chosen here as Figure 2 a portrait of her dancing by Isaiah West Taber (1830 – 1912) I chose this both because of the wonderful sensitivity and expressively captured motion of the image but also because it is so similar to Toluose-Lautrec’s painting.

Figure 2 - Loie Fuller by I. W. Taber. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 2 – Loie Fuller by I. W. Taber. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.

The first feline superstar

Figure 1 - Portrait of Miss Anna Holch holding Buzzer the Cat, 1913, by Arnold Genthe and in the US LOC. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 1 – Portrait of Miss Anna Holch holding Buzzer the Cat, 1913, by Arnold Genthe and in the US LOC. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.

A while back I blogged about “The World’s First Super Model” Evelyn Nesbit. Quite contemporary with Miss Nesbit was a cat named “Buzzer” who belonged to the great early twentieth century photographer Arnold Genthe (1869-1942).- if cat’s ever truly belong to a person instead of the other way around. I will remind you that “Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.”

Genthe photographed many beautiful woman: friends, actresses, and socialites and Buzzer often appeared as an “extra” in these photographs – or perhaps they were actually portraits of Buzzer, with the women being extras. It is an important point of portraiture that hands can appear awkward and facial expressions stiff. But if you place something in the person’s hands you give them a natural look. And what better “prop” for the hands than a cat, who was also guaranteed to melt the severest countenance. Genthe describes Buzzer

“Buzzer IV, whom I had with me for eighteen years, was a large, short-haired yellow cat — half Chinese, half Persian — looking more like a small tiger. He was very haughty, but never vicious, and he seldom condescended to make friends with strangers.”

And in fact, much like movie and stage animal stars of  today there were actually four Buzzers over the course of Arnold Genthe’s career. There is a wonderful collection of portraits of Buzzer and his ladies in the Library of Congress. I include as Figure 1 above one example, a charming 1913 portrait with Miss Anna Holch.

How we behave toward cats here below determines our status in heaven.”
– Robert A. Heinlein

 

Memorial Day 2016

Figure 1 - The British Grand Fleet sails out to meet the German navy, May 30, 1916. In the public somain in the Unites States because of its age.

Figure 1 – The British Grand Fleet sails out to meet the German navy, May 30, 1916. In the public domain in the Unites Stated because of its age.

In the United States today is Memorial Day and we remember those who gave their lives for our freedoms. Memorial Day began as Decoration Day in 1868 to remember those who died in the American Civil War. But, of course and very sadly, there have been so many wars since and continuing.

The magic of photography is that it can take us back. So today I offer the image of Figure 1, which was taken one century ago today and shows the British fleet, “The Grand Fleet,” sailing out of Scarpa Flow, under the command of Admiral Sir John Jellicoe, to engage the Germans in what was to become known as the Battle of Jutland over the next two days. It was a critical moment in what was then the world’s most terrible war, and for the British, the rulers of the seas, everything stood in the balance. History has deemed the engagement a draw – but significantly the Germans never again challenged British supremacy at sea. So among those that we honor and remember today are the 8,645 souls who lost their lives that day.

Significantly, 1916 was a politically fulminating year. Just a month before British troops had occupied Dublin to put down the Easter rebellion. It was the start of a wave that would finally undo the major monarchies of Europe and the peace forged at the  Congress of Vienna. Among these monarchies would fall the Ottomans, which would lead in turn to what David Fromkin has called the “peace to end all peace” in the Middle East. That is a war we still fight today.

It is strange how all but the most dedicated student of history forgets the details. But May 30, 1916 was very real to those who lived through that day on the North Sea. We can imagine both their confidence and fear. We remember them and all the fallen of all the wars

Dona nobis pacem.

Photographic First # 21 – The first media president

Figure 1 - Theodore Roosevelt campaigning from the US LOC and in the public domain because of its age.

Figure 1 – Theodore Roosevelt campaigning from the US LOC and in the public domain because of its age.

Following on my blog of this past Friday, I’d like to discuss the first president who used the media of photography and video. Just as Obama was the first presidential candidate to fully exploit the revolution of the internet, it was Theodore Roosevelt who first utilized photography and motion pictures to effect. McKinley was the first president to appear in a movie sequence, but it was Roosevelt who exploited its potential. Figure 1 shows the young presidential candidate campaigning.

But I found something that I believe is truly remarkable. In October of I910 the Wright Brothers held an airshow or air meet in St Louis, MO. TR, who at the time was no longer president, was invited by aviator Arch Hoxsey to join him on a flight in a biplane. This is immortalized in the image of Figure 2. But more remarkably, the event was filmed. It was the first time that a United States president flew. The Colonel at first refuses the invitation, but then he realizes the value of the effect and agrees. And true to form his assessment of the event was “Bully!”

Figure 1 - TR on a biplane with Arche Hoxsey, the first US President to fly. From the US LOC and in the public domain because of its age.

Figure 1 – TR on a biplane with Arche Hoxsey, the first US President to fly. From the US LOC and in the public domain because of its age.

Photographic Firsts # 20 – The presidential campaign of 1896

Figure 1 - The first Lincoln Douglas debate in Ottawa, IL, 1858. From www.lib.niu.edu and in the public domain because of its age.

Figure 1 – The first Lincoln Douglas debate in Ottawa, IL, October 13,1858. From www.lib.niu.edu and in the public domain because of its age.

A while back I blogged about the first presidential campaign button.  In the US right now, we are election-obsessed, and I started wondering about early photographs of presidential campaigns. It is a bit of a quagmire. This is especially so because until fairly recently not all candidates actually campaigned for themselves or at least didn’t venture beyond their own front porches..

My initial research on the subject did unearth some pretty remarkable images. The first of these is the image of Figure 1, which shows the first of the Lincoln-Douglass debates in Ottawa, Illinois. These debates took place during the senatorial race of 1858 and the image was taken on October 13, 1858.

As for the question of the earliest photographs of an American presidential campaign, so far, the earliest that I can find appear to come from the campaigns of 1896. I am hopeful that some reader will point me towards earlier images. The Democratic candidate [and I want to emphasize for my Republican friends that it is the Democratic Party not the Democrat Party!] the “Great Commoner,” William Jennings Bryan took to the rails on an intense “whistle stop” tour of the United States. Figure 2 shows him in Wellsville, Ohio with his train behind him. McKinley chose to stay home or at least to stay in the home, ”The Campaign House” that he and his wife Ida had rented in Canton, OH for the occasion.  The crowds visiting the Republican candidate became so large that a special speakers’ platform had to be erected on the front lawn as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2 _ William Jennings Bryan campaigning in 1896 in Wellsville, OH. From the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain because of its age.

Figure 2 _ William Jennings Bryan campaigning in 1896 in Wellsville, OH. From the Wikimedia Commons and in the public domain because of its age.

The burning issue of the day was the gold vs.gold plus silver standard for United States currency. Bryan believed that bimetallism  a combined gold and silver standard would bring prosperity to the nation and in his “Cross of Gold Speech” he famously intoned”

“If they dare to come out in the open field and defend the gold standard as a good thing, we shall fight them to the uttermost, having behind us the producing masses of the nation and the world. Having behind us the commercial interests and the laboring interests and all the toiling masses, we shall answer their demands for a gold standard by saying to them, you shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns. You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”

And nobody argued about the size of their hands.

Figure - McKinley campaigning in 1896 from the porch of his "Campaign House." From the US LOC and in the public doman because of its age.

Figure – McKinley campaigning in 1896 from the porch of his “Campaign House.” From the US LOC and in the public domain because of its age.

Zaida Ben-Yusuf

Figure 1 - Self Portrait of Zaida Ben-Yusuf 1901, from the Wikipedia and the US LOC, in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Self Portrait of Zaida Ben-Yusuf 1901, from the Wikipedia and the US LOC, in the public domain.

The other morning when I was researching malapropisms for my post on “allegory bread,” I was taken aback to find a portrait of Miss Lydia Languish the protagonist of Sheridan’s play “The Rivals.” After all she is a fictional character. How could there be a photograph of her? Well, I suppose there are more bizarre things happening in “this best of all possible worlds.”

But as it turns out, and to set the balance of reality right, the photograph turned out to be a portrait of the end of century (19th – 20 th) actress Elsie Leslie in her role as Lydia Languish (1899) by“Zaida Ben-Yusuf (1869 – 1933).  So we return to a favorite topic, namely 19th century portrait photographers and their salons. Ben-Yusuf was, indeed, one of the greats in this arena. You get the sense that New York City was crowded at the time with such studios. Ben-Yusuf’s studio was at 124 Fifth Avenue. She was noted for her artistic portraits of wealthy, fashionable, and famous Americans of the turn of the 19th–20th century. She was born in London to a German mother and an Algerian father.  In 1901 the Ladies Home Journal featured her as one of  “The Foremost Women Photographers in America.” Significantly in 1896, one of her studies was exhibited in London as part of an exhibition put on by The Linked Ring, the English counterpart to Steiglitz’s “Photo Secessionist” movement. She was a prolific writer and champion of photography as an art form.

For many years Miss Ben-Yusuf’s work and name had fallen into relative obscurity. However, in 2008, the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery mounted an exhibition dedicated to her work, and this has had the effect of re-establishing her as a key figure in the early development of fine art photography in America.

I wanted to feature here two of her Images. The first, Figure 1, is a self-portrait taken in 1901. It accompanied her article “The New Photography — What it has done and is doing for Modern Portraiture,” which was published in the “Metropolitan Magazine”, Vol. XIV, no. III (Sept, 1901), p. 391. The second image, Figure 2, is wonderful for its modernity and powerful pose is her 1899 portrait of Sadakichi Hartmann.

We find ourselves confronted again with nineteenth or early twentieth century visages and the complex set of emotions that they inspire. Have no delusions, it was a tough time to live, but in the United States at least, it was a time of great opportunity. This world of beautiful women clad in crinoline wearing pensive gazes like an army of Lydia Languishes is just exotic enough as to be appealing. Never mind that these are our grandparents and great grandparents. We want to believe that life was simpler then. It was not. The simplicity comes from the superior perch of hindsight. We know their stories. We know what is going to happen. For them a dangerous, life threatening infection was never far away. The great illusion here – the magic of photography – is that we almost feel that if we broke the silence, they could answer us.

 

Figure 1 - Portrait of Sadakichi Hartmann by Zaida Ben-Yusuf, 1899. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.

Figure 1 – Portrait of Sadakichi Hartmann by Zaida Ben-Yusuf, 1899. In the public domain in the United States because of its age.