The Photo Ark project

The other evening I was watching a fascinating documentary about National Geographic photographer Jim Sartore’s project to preserve photographically as many of the worlds animal species as he can. He entitles this The Photo Ark, and the analogy is poignant.  It is a very noble effort and his work is stunning; so I thought that I would share his website with everyone. I recommend it to nature lovers and photographers alike. Sartore is following  a simple but striking approach: to photograph against either pure white or pure black. You may remember my recommendation to photograph flowers at night with flash.

Pictorially this is a magnificent approach. It isolates the species, which is intriguing because in reality species are always part of an ecosystem and have no true existence outside of this system. Here they get to stand for a moment in the sun or in the moonlight by themselves. And this sets them off in isolation. They are beautiful, but for many this may be the end of a long evolutionary line.

 

Picture of the day – Mr. President and the First Lady

Well, I have to say that the best photographs of Tuesday’s big snowstorm in the Northeast have to be the images taken by the robot eyes of the American Eagle Foundations webcam at the National Arboretum. Here the mating pair of American Bald Eagles, “Mr. President” and “First Lady” go to extremes to protect their eggs from the late spring assault on their nest by Old Man Winter and Mother Nature. The morale, of course, is one of parental love and dedication, or, if you wish, of the intense instinctual need to extend and propagate your DNA.Whatever we may think of the maternal instincts of the raptor, as in welcome to Jurassic Park, here we have, in the extreme, the instinctual engine that drives biological evolution.

Imogen Cunningham, in Focus at the Boston MFA

Figure 1 - Dream, 1910 by Imogen Cunningham. From the Wikipedia and in the public domain because of its age.

Figure 1 – Dream, 1910 by Imogen Cunningham. From the Wikipedia and in the public domain because of its age.

I went today to see the new exhibit at the Museum of Fine Arts of 35 photographs in their Lane Collection by Imogen Cunningham (1883–1976). Cunningham was a significant figure in the definitive years of 20th Century American photography. She was a co-founder of Group f/64, along with Edward Weston, Ansel Adams, and other San Francisco Bay Area photographers. For photographers of my generation, Imogen stands with Adams and Weston as defining of what photography should be. And being present at the end of her career we were enthralled with her landmark work, “After Ninety (1979).” My copy has been studied many times. The view of the f/64 Group represented an aesthetic of sharply-focused images and natural subjects. Cunningham, for the most part, preferred close-up botanicals and portraits to stunning and collosal landscapes, like those of Ansel Adams.

So a few points, first I found myself squinting in a dim light at some gorgeously intimate images. I still get the sense that photography is a poor second cousin at the MFA. That said, I have been to several wonderful shows there, and the word intimate almost always come to mind. But, I am not ready to “Rage, rage against the dying of the light.” OK, so we can take dim intimacy as a plus. The second point, is that I was reminded of what a wonderful medium silver gelatin was, and is. We can expect that in years hence there will be retro-minded artist, who will toil to produce it. Modern Giclée has its own appeal. It is just different. The third point that surprised me was that, while Cunningham’s group practiced a purity of image and eschewed excessive manipulation, Cunningham was a master of double exposure, solarization, and combined negatives.

Happily the last image that you encountered as you exit the gallery is Judy Dater’s famous Imogen and Twinka (1974). This has become ever so iconic an defining.

Oh, and the exhibit lasts until June 18. So go see it for yourself!

Favorite Photograph 2016 #10, “Mahmoud Rslan/AFP, “Rescued Syrian Child, 2016”

Last year, when we reached this culminating point in my favorite photographs list, I found that I could not escape the immediate and haunting images of Syrian refugees and in particular of  Nilufer Demir Aylan’s Story showing a police officer cradling the lifeless body of the drowned child.  When I first saw that picture everyone said that it would prove to be a “game changer.” I doubted it at the time and have not been proven wrong.

So now twelve months later we find ourselves on “that sad height.” We are haunted once again, this time by a photograph taken by Mahmoud Rslan of the AFP of a dazed and bloodied Syrian boy named Omran Daqneesh, who had just been  rescued from a destroyed building in Aleppo after an air strike. Again the call for outrage and inaction. This must be my “Favorite Photograph # 10 for 2016.” Rslan has captured all the tragedy and despair of the moment, ever so masterfully.Funny to call it “favorite,” since it will haunt me for a very long time. Little Omran reminds me ever so much of the two children revealed beneath the Robes of the Ghost of Christmas Present in Charles Dicken’s “A Christmas Carol.” Their names we are told are “Ignorance and Want.”

I do not know the answer to the problems which cause such tragedies or the solution to global impotence. I only know that there will be more such photographs. The New Year will usher in its own iconic photographs of misery. I only know that the world could benefit from more empathy and acts of human kindness.

 

 

 

 

Favorite Photographs 2016 #8, Ansel Adams, “Mount Williamson, The Sierra Nevada, from Manzanar, California, 1945”

I think that it is important to every once in a while, perhaps more often than not, to spend some time studying the photographs of Ansel Adams. So for Favorite Photograph 2016 #8 I have chosen Adams’ “Mount Williamson, The Sierra Nevada, from Manzanar, California, 1945.” This image is exemplary in what it teaches us about the superfluity of color, about the possibilities of  tonal range and depth of field. It is truly a masterpiece, and I cannot tell you how often I have stood before it in awe at a gallery or exhibition. It makes you want to rush back out with your camera to try again to equal the master.

And there is one other point about it that has always struck me and that is the perspective. You have this sensation that you want to bend down and see things from a bit lower. Adams created this sensation with his camera position and along with the depth of field it lends a sense of dynamism and three-dimensionality to the image. A contributing factor to this sense of motion is the way in which the human eye perceives. We construct the whole in our minds but our eye perceives in a series of points of concentration, which in this case involves details of the foreground, midground, and background. That is why the depth of field is so important in making this image work. If you were to fuzz out one element it would have the effect of stabilizing the image in your eye. But as is, the whole effect is like being there.

Favorite Photographs 2016 #7, Dorothea Lange, “There’s no way like the American way, 1937”

Today’s Favorite Photograph is one of the great social commentary juxtaposition photographs of all time, Dorothea Lange’s, “There’s no way like the American way, 1937.” It shows African American men and women in Louisville, Kentucky, lining up to seek food and clothing from a relief station, in front of a billboard proclaiming, “World’s Highest Standard of Living.” This was taken during the Great Ohio River Flood of 1937. It is iconic and arguably Lange’s greatest image. It is a documentary of both its own time and all time. And it reminds us of the need for empathy and human kindness – a fundameental lesson that many have forgotten.

Favorite Photograph 2016 #6, Herbert Ponting “Sled dog listening to gramophone, c1910”

Figure 1 - Herbert Ponting's "Sled dog listening to gramophone, 1910." From the Wikicommons and in the public domain.

Figure 1 – Herbert Ponting’s “Sled dog listening to gramophone, 1910.” From the Wikicommons and in the public domain in the United States because of its age.

I am fascinated by the documentary photographs taken by Herbert Ponting and Frank Hurley of the British Antarctic expeditions of over a century ago. So, this morning I found myself revisiting all of these old friends and searching out which image was my favorite among the great Antarctic vistas. But in the end, I came back to the photograph by Ponting of Figure 1. This shows one of the led dogs on the ill-fated Scott Antarctic Expedition intrigued by the “human magic” of the grammophone.

This image is pointed for several reasons. It documents technology with other technologies. The fact is that in those days of the early twentieth century it was the dogs not the technology that resulted in success or failure. It was the profound and saprophytic relationship that had intertwined man and dog since prehistoric times. Ponting’s photograph is transitional between two centuries, between the Victorian and the Edwardian ages.  And what this photograph ultimately says is that in that hostile and tenuous environment, where life and death hang in the balance and where the melodic voice of civilization is barely audible, it is the old alliance between man and canine that ultimately counts.

“He had been suddenly jerked from the heart of civilization and flung into the heart of things primordial.”
Jack London, The Call of the Wild, 1903.

Favorite Photographs 2016 #5, Eliot Porter, “Stephen Porter with Bull Snake, Tesuque, New Mexico, 1948”

I was writing this blog on Christmas Day. My wife gave me a signed copy of Abelardo Morell’s “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” for the holidays. Now that is a truly wonderful book of photographs. And it got me thinking about all of the wonderful photography books that my wife had given me over the years. Several of these were portfolios by the great nature photographer Eliot Porter(1901-1990). Porter photographed the places that we liked to visit, Maine and the Adirondacks, and so has always carried a special meaning for us. And there was also an amazing book of photographs of Antarctica. 

Porter practiced photography in the milieu of Ansel Adams with the major exception that most of Porter’s images were in color. And color, mostly dye transfer prints in those days, was not as easy as it is today. He was a master at his craft. And I have spent a couple of days now revisiting some great images. I have been looking for the perfect image for this favorite series. Then I found something unusual. It was not a dramatic color image of nature. But rather an intimate portrait in black and white of his seven year old son Stephen with a bull snake. Yes the image is of nature, but in reality the image captures ever so perfectly the meaning of American boyhood.

Favorite Photographs 2016 #4, Yousef Karsh, “Winston Churchill, 1941”

I find that the best place to find favorites is to go back to basics – back to the images that you have loved, it seems like forever. So today’s favorite is one of my all time favorite portraits, Yousef Karsh’s, “Winston Churchill, 1941.” This image was produced for Life Magazine and is truly iconic. It was an image taken during a time of war and deep national threat. It was an image taken in a world that needed heroes. We always need heroes. And it was an image for the ages. And that raises a significant question. Is the taking of such an image an act solely immediate or is there always a sense of history and timelessness even at the moment of conception.

The story of how Karsh created his Churchill portrait has been repeated so many times, that it itself has become iconic, and certainly bears retelling one more time. Chiurchill had just addressed the Canadian Parliament and Karsh was there to record the moment. “He was in no mood for portraiture and two minutes were all that he would allow me as he passed from the House of Commons chamber to an anteroom …Two niggardly minutes in which I must try to put on film a man who had already written or inspired a library of books, baffled all his biographers, filled the world with his fame, and me, on this occasion, with dread.” Churchill stalked into the room where Karsh’s camera was set up.  He was scowling, “regarding my camera as he might regard the German enemy.” His expression suited Karsh perfectly but the cigar? “Instinctively, I removed the cigar. At this the Churchillian scowl deepened, the head was thrust forward belligerently, and the hand placed on the hip in an attitude of anger.” This was the defiant and unconquerable Prime Minister. This was the epitome of the defiant and unconquerable British people. Churchill later said to him, “You can even make a roaring lion stand still to be photographed,” and Karsh entitled it, The Roaring Lion. The Roaring Lion is one of the masterpieces of photographic portraiture.